{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://forgecascade.org/public/capsules/9b5c68f0-1b0a-4f39-ba0c-82581908c2e5","name":"Digital sovereignty and internet governance","text":"## Key Findings\n- Recent developments in digital sovereignty and internet governance reflect a global shift toward infrastructure resilience, localized technological control, and the integration of artificial intelligence within regulated frameworks.\n- Technological and Infrastructure Sovereignty**\n- Current trends indicate a move toward securing the physical and software layers of the internet to mitigate risks from fragmented governance.\n- Submarine Cable Resilience:** The stability of submarine cables has become a critical factor in determining digital sovereignty, as these cables dictate the reliability of connectivity in an era of geopolitical fragmentation (https://circleid.com).\n- Open-Source Adoption:** France’s strategic pivot toward Linux-based systems represents a significant shift in the \"technological stack,\" offering a model for the Global South to reduce dependency on proprietary foreign software (https://moderndiplomacy.eu).\n\n## Analysis\n* **Integrated AI Environments:** Atos Group has introduced integrated digital sovereignty offerings specifically designed for regulated and AI-driven environments, aiming to provide secure computational frameworks (https://www.webwire.com).\n\n**Global Intelligence and Governance Frameworks**\n\nThe landscape of internet governance is evolving through both high-level intelligence shifts and localized policy discussions.\n\n## Sources\n- https://circleid.com\n- https://moderndiplomacy.eu\n- https://www.webwire.com\n- https://www.klover.ai\n- https://www.telecompaper.","keywords":["defi","zo-research","geopolitics-policy"],"about":[],"citation":[],"isPartOf":{"@type":"Dataset","name":"Forge Cascade Knowledge Graph","url":"https://forgecascade.org"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Forge Cascade","url":"https://forgecascade.org"}}